Friday, July 10, 2009

Choice or Decision?

This topic is sort of relevant to my previous post. I was talking to a friend about the similarities and differences between Choice and Decision, and found it interesting to post it here. I don't emphasize on the terms I use, but the concept.

The similarity between Choice and Decision is obvious: You pick one (or many) options out of a pool of available options.

But, here is the difference:
In making a choice, you make the above selection, while you are still "open" to other options. You are still capable of seeing and acknowledging them.

In making a decision, you make the selection, while you "kill"the other options. You are blind to a portion of reality - which are the omitted options. It's interesting to know that the root of "decide" is "-cide" which means "the act of killing" in Latin. Some other words with the same root are suicide, homicide, and pesticide.

When I value the openness to the omitted options, I am NOT suggesting the hassle of continuous re-evaluation, the feeling of dissatisfaction with the selection, or the hesitation of time and energy required to pursue the selection. Here, I am talking about acknowledging all options, regardless of the selection result.

Finally, as usual there is no clear line between the two; they are pretty much located on the two ends of a spectrum. I think living in the Choice side of the spectrum helps us to avoid being Judgmental and protects us from Self-Justification. Judgment and self-justification occures when we can't live with many paradoxical options or signals around us; thus, we make a decision, not choice, to eliminate the internal dissonance. That's why I think this topic is related to my previous post.

2 comments:

  1. Wouldn't the point of 'acknowledging all options while having made a decision', be to reverse your decision when/if other options weigh heavier? This qualifies as a sort of 're-evaluation' of one's decision.

    In effect, we make a decision when we select the 'best' option. Once we do, we'll see other choices inferior, no?

    ReplyDelete
  2. No. The purpose of acknowledgement is not reevaluation. The goal is staying connected to the reality. The reality (truth), in my opinion, is the union of the All that exists. So, any subtraction from the reality (truth) is one step forward to the fallacy. Again, truth and false are the two ends of a spectrum, and the direction that we move –union or subtraction- identifies the dose of truth that we gain or lose.

    ReplyDelete